Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   Discuss Fitness > General > Diet and Nutrition

Diet and Nutrition Discuss the best diets for both losing and gaining weight. Sub forum: Related Recipes


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30-Nov-04, 01:14 PM   #1
kungfu74
-|||------|||-
 
kungfu74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Age: 34
Posts: 593

Extreme Calorie Counting


Pulled from the Dallas Morning News from Today's issue:

Extreme calorie counting

Disciplined and dedicated, they eat light for a long life

07:21 PM CST on Monday, November 29, 2004

By KIM PIERCE / Special Contributor to The Dallas Morning News

Michael Cooper is eating far less than normal in an attempt to live far longer.

[Click image for a larger version] NATALIE CAUDILL/DMN
NATALIE CAUDILL/DMN
Michael Cooper, 56, takes in about 1,100 calories a day on a diet that milks the maximum possible nutrition from every single calorie. Above, he displays one day's food.

"I'm a self-experiment," he says, "a guinea pig."

Inspired by the book Maximum Life Span by Dr. Roy Walford, the Garland resident became one of the first people in the country in 1986 to take up something called "calorie restriction." By eating significantly less than the accepted norms, Mr. Cooper hopes to improve both the quality and quantity of his life.

Mr. Cooper, 56, is so fascinated with beating back Father Time, in fact, that he gave up a successful career in electrical engineering and now spends his days as a doctoral candidate in the new aging research labs at Southern Methodist University.

Twelve hundred miles away in Southern California, expatriate Texan Louise Gold pounded the shoreline for months in preparation for September's 2004 Maui Marathon. At 48, the certified public accountant still likes to win and placed third in her age group in the Maui race.

She, too, follows a restricted-calorie diet, which has been shown in animals to extend life span, sometimes dramatically.

"I want to live to be very, very old," she says, "and I want to be running when I'm very, very old."At a time when most Americans are struggling with obesity and being overweight, a handful of contrarians eschew the Krispy Kremes, the Häagen-Dazs, the Big Macs and the 16-ounce T-bones – many won't even touch bread, pasta or most fruits – in pursuit of a longer, more vigorous life.

They are part of the Calorie Restriction Society, a group of about 2,000 members, mostly in America, who adhere to a strict high-nutrient, low-calorie diet in the hopes that eating less will mean living longer – perhaps to an age of 120, which most scientists consider the maximum potential human life span.

They're pinning their hopes on research that's been done since the early 20th century but was revived in earnest only about 30 years ago, showing that animals – from spiders to dogs – live longer and better when they eat substantially less. Scientists at the University of Wisconsin at Madison are engaged in a long-term study of rhesus monkeys. And some limited studies on human practitioners of calorie-restriction have shown promising effects on health.

But here's the hitch: No one knows what the long-term results will be with humans or what the downside of eating this way might be. Dr. Walford died this year of ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease, at age 79, considerably short of his goal.

For humans, "there's no proof that calorie restriction prolongs life because we basically don't have those studies," says Jo Ann Carson, professor of clinical nutrition at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas.

"It is scientifically plausible," she says.

But the issue is complex. In animal studies, especially with rats and mice, the question is no longer whether calorie restriction works to prolong life, but how.

"We discovered that in the 1970s," says Edward J. Masoro, emeritus professor in the department of physiology at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, whose research was devoted to calorie restriction.

"We're not trying to prove it works," he says from his home in Charleston, S.C. "The question is, what's the mechanism that makes it work? That has not been uncovered unequivocally.

"I don't practice calorie restriction," he adds. "I did have a coronary bypass when I was 69. I'll be 80 this year. After that, I ate a low-fat diet. ... I did exercise."

Not for everyone

Anyone contemplating the regimen should read carefully the list of cautions and hazards on the CR Society Web site (www.calorie restriction.org), Dr. Carson says.

"Number One, you shouldn't do this if you're still growing," she says. "You should not do it if you're pregnant. I wouldn't suggest someone already ill, with cancer or HIV, try this. ... Someone who might be prone to an eating disorder, when exposed to this concept, it might precipitate anorexia nervosa or foster it."

The CR Society Web site has a lengthy section detailing the differences between calorie restriction and anorexia. Among the differences, CR devotees are not motivated by appearance. In fact, Mr. Cooper notes, he would probably look better if he put on a few pounds. CR practitioners pay attention to calories, whereas anorexics focus on weight. People practicing CR also are keenly attuned to nutrition.

There are much more data supporting calorie restriction as a healthy lifestyle than exist for the popular Atkins diet, says Dr. Masoro. But, as he points out in one of his papers on the subject, we still don't know empirically the effect of calorie restriction on humans.

Other problems listed on the Web site range from menstrual irregularity to reduced bone mass. But ask Mr. Cooper and Ms. Gold what the worst issue is and they say it's being cold.

"The biggest negative, bar none, is cold," says Ms. Gold. "I'm always cold. In fact, I miss the Texas heat." Most of sunny Southern California is comparably warm, but where Ms. Gold lives on the ocean in Marina del Rey, temperatures rarely climb above the 70s. People who practice calorie restriction are cold because they eventually lose most of their insulating body fat and their body temperatures may drop. Mr. Cooper's normal temperature is closer to 96 degrees than the standard 98.6.

"That's the one thing – you don't retain heat. You don't generate heat much," says the 6-foot-2, pencil-thin Mr. Cooper. "I started at 165 pounds. I was a lot fuller in the face. Now I'm down under 130. I'm wearing three layers of shirts to keep warm." He shows the sleeve of his thermal underwear poking out at his wrist. "Walking around, I'm fine. If I sit down to study, I get cold."

Motivations

Calorie restriction is a little different for everyone. Some practitioners are strict, and some take a more relaxed approach.

"The degree of calorie restriction is almost linearly related to the degree of anti-aging effect, or reduction in disease risk," says Brian Delaney, current president and a founding member of the Calorie Restriction Society, from his home in Sweden. "If you lift weights a little bit, you'll get a little bit stronger," he says, using an analogy. "If you lift weights a lot, you get a lot stronger."

Mr. Delaney, an American who teaches German philosophy part time at Stockholm-area universities and is a doctoral candidate in philosophy at the University of Chicago, has been practicing calorie restriction for 12 years.

By and large, he says, people who practice calorie restriction fall into two groups.

"One is interested in living longer," he says. "There aren't that many people who want to live a longer life than others. The motivation is an unusual motivation.

"The other people are more interested in the disease-preventive effects of the diet," he says, which are beginning to be documented in short-term human studies. "It's that latter group that we've seen grow over the last two years.

"All of them are highly motivated people, highly disciplined people," he adds.

No one has studied the psychology of calorie restriction, says Mr. Delaney. But Dean Pomerleau, a CR practitioner and robotics entrepreneur who lives near Pittsburgh, presented informal observations at last year's Calorie Restriction Society national conference.

"It was mostly personal anecdote," he says. "I think the overwhelming evidence of those of us who do it actively, it's actually a very enjoyable way to live, once you hit your stride."

But during the transition phase, people may have discomfiting experiences. They may dwell on food more than they would otherwise, for example. "They may develop a tendency to think about what they're missing out on," says Dr. Pomerleau, who has a doctorate in computer science.

This can manifest itself as obsessive tendencies, such as hoarding food or conserving personal energy, according to his presentation. Other difficulties in the transitional phase may include loss of energy, decreased sex drive and social isolation.

"When I started CR, I was crabbier," he says, "because of the hunger." As the body struggles to adjust to fewer calories, he says, people may experience "unhappiness." He views the irritability and other negative behaviors as short-term effects. A few people, he adds, may use calorie restriction as a mask for anorexia or as a way of justifying their disorder.

"I think it appeals to geeky engineering types who, for better or worse, are more typically men than women," Dr. Pomerleau adds. "Many of us enjoy the challenge of trying to achieve optimal nutrition on a limited-calorie budget."

Strict diet

Mr. Cooper acknowledges he fits the engineering type. He adheres closely to the mix of high-nutrient, low-calorie foods.

On a typical day while he's working in the lab, Mr. Cooper eats two eggs soft-fried in a little olive oil for breakfast; tomato juice seasoned with hot peppers and a tin of sardines for lunch; at least three kinds of vegetables, such as spinach, broccoli and tomatoes, perhaps with onions and tamari soy sauce, for early dinner; and "something with protein," such as whey or soy, in yogurt after his two-mile evening walk.

"I don't eat fruit except berries," he says. "I stay away from bananas – too many calories for the nutrition. What I eat, I like, too. I really enjoy what I eat. ... I'll occasionally have chocolate.

"I take a handful of supplements," he adds. When he gets hungry, he starts with water or flavored water. But he says he knows he needs food when he can't keep warm at room temperature.

And when dining out with friends, he adapts. "They probably won't notice, but I'll eat less than they," he says. "I'm not going to stand out in a crowd. I'm not going to carry lettuce to a party."

He speculates that if he weighed quite a bit more, his energy might be drained. "Like many people, I have an abundance of energy for things that I enjoy, and those are many things," he says.

But for most people, calorie restriction is too difficult.

"It requires an enormous amount of self-discipline," says Allen Baskind, Mr. Cooper's physician, who has tracked his health since the early '90s.

"I would say I had some doubts about it, yes," Dr. Baskind says, "but the majority of the problems we see that are lifestyle-related are absent in him. He has excellent blood pressure, excellent blood lipids, and he certainly does not have any of the problems that might be associated with indiscretions in terms of eating and drinking."

And what do the numbers say? "I think he appears younger than his chronological age," Dr. Baskind says.

The benefits

Ms. Gold takes a less severe approach, she says, losing only about 1 to 2 pounds every six months since she started CR three years ago. She continues to run competitively. Unlike Mr. Cooper, she simply eats less of what she has eaten since switching to healthier habits in her 20s.

"I tend to eat smaller amounts of the foods I've always enjoyed. I eat Mexican. I eat Italian. But I definitely eat much smaller portions. I'm a runner, so carbs are my friend," she says. "Other people ... say they look at rice and it's a bowl of sugar. I look at rice and see fuel for my running. I think rice and pasta and potatoes are fine. It's the calories that matter.

"And that's the whole focus of the calorie-restriction program," she says. "I hate to call it a diet. It's really a lifestyle change. You focus on nutrients and calories. I drink milk. I eat cheese. I love going out for sushi."

She also eats a lot of leafy greens. A salad with salmon or chicken, dressing on the side, is a lunchtime staple.

"I usually don't get hungry," she says, "because I eat small amounts of food up to about 6 p.m. each day. I just get tired at night."

But she wakes up raring to go, she says, and has always had a lot of energy. "When I am below 120 pounds, I feel lighter on my feet."

Ms. Gold was a subject in a recent pilot study at the School of Medicine at Washington University in St. Louis, which measured the impact of lower-calorie diets on health risks. The study matched 18 people, ages 35 to 82, who ate 1,100 to 1,950 calories a day to a test group following a typical Western diet. The average American eats 1,975 to 3,550 calories a day, according to the study.

The results were similar to those Dr. Baskind observed in Mr. Cooper: The markers for disease and aging were minimized. For instance, the calorie-restricted subjects' total cholesterol and LDL (the so-called "bad" cholesterol) were in the bottom 10 percent for their age group; their HDL (the so-called "good" cholesterol) was high; their triglycerides were lower than those of most Americans in their 20s. Average blood pressure was 100/60, comparable to that of a 10-year-old. Ms. Gold's was slightly higher, about 110/70.

"I started running to combat high blood pressure," she says. It was 190/110 in her early 20s. "My doctor told me when I was 23, if I didn't change my ways, I'd have a stroke by the time I was 30."

She estimates that the Washington University study spent about $8,000 a subject on tests ranging from blood workups to stress tests. She has experienced no menstrual problems and her bone density is that of a woman half her age, she says, "because of all the years of running."

Ms. Gold says that most CR adherents, herself and Mr. Cooper included, don't believe in an afterlife. "It seems like the majority are agnostic or atheist," she says. "They want to maximize this life. They don't believe there is going to be a next one."

And they've got plans for those extra years.

"As long as I can," Mr. Cooper says, "I'm going to be working on the problem of extending human life. ... The key to understanding aging and slowing it down and keeping youthful for a very long time might happen in our lifetime. ... I want to be found trying."

E-mail kpierce1@airmail.net

THE CALORIE RESTRICTION SOCIETY

Started in 1994, the society describes itself primarily as an electronic bulletin board for people interested in pursuing or learning more about the practice of calorie restriction and the science behind it.

"The principle behind the diet is very simple," says Brian Delaney, the society's current president and a founding member of the nonprofit group. "Reduce the energy content of your diet, and the body shifts resources toward repair and maintenance.

"This doesn't mean eat less food. You don't want a shortage of vitamin C, B vitamins and so on. It's calories, which are a measurement of energy."

Gerontologist Roy Walford, one of the leading figures in calorie-restriction research, was also among the founding members of the nonprofit group. He revived earlier controversial research and gave it credence, and he wrote in the popular press about the anti-aging effects of calorie restriction. He may be best known as the chief of medical operations in Biosphere 2 in Arizona. He died earlier this year, at 79, of Lou Gehrig's disease.

The society, with nearly 2,000 members worldwide, provides e-mail discussion groups, research updates and advice on practicing calorie restriction responsibly, from how to eat to recommended medical tests.

A basic membership, which includes entree into the discussion groups, is free. People may opt to become supporting members for $35 a year.

On the Web: www.calorierestriction.org

Or call: 310-329-6511 or 1-800-929-6511

Kim Pierce
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
__________________
pick weight up, put weight down!
kungfu74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-Nov-04, 01:39 PM   #2
abarlament
Registered User
 
abarlament's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ohio University
Age: 22
Posts: 3,818
Send a message via AIM to abarlament Send a message via MSN to abarlament
It's an interesting proposition. I've seen stuff like this before in SciAm. Basic premis is that the VLCDs kill mutant/diseased cells, lessen the effects of free radicals, and lower risks of disease.
abarlament is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-Nov-04, 03:11 PM   #3
Lady C
"I know squat"
 
Lady C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,626
Quote:
"The biggest negative, bar none, is cold," says Ms. Gold. "I'm always cold. In fact, I miss the Texas heat." Most of sunny Southern California is comparably warm, but where Ms. Gold lives on the ocean in Marina del Rey, temperatures rarely climb above the 70s. People who practice calorie restriction are cold because they eventually lose most of their insulating body fat and their body temperatures may drop. Mr. Cooper's normal temperature is closer to 96 degrees than the standard 98.6.

"That's the one thing – you don't retain heat. You don't generate heat much," says the 6-foot-2, pencil-thin Mr. Cooper. "I started at 165 pounds. I was a lot fuller in the face. Now I'm down under 130. I'm wearing three layers of shirts to keep warm." He shows the sleeve of his thermal underwear poking out at his wrist. "Walking around, I'm fine. If I sit down to study, I get cold."
That is asinine. He is losing all of his muscle mass! I would much rather worry about having to work in another routine per week to keep my shape than having to buy another sweater to stay warm.
Lady C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-Nov-04, 03:42 PM   #4
kungfu74
-|||------|||-
 
kungfu74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Age: 34
Posts: 593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady C
That is asinine.
I completely agree! just thought those here might find it an "interesting" read.
__________________
pick weight up, put weight down!
kungfu74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-Nov-04, 04:05 PM   #5
Lift2Live
Registered User
 
Lift2Live's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Age: 33
Posts: 2,204
Send a message via Yahoo to Lift2Live
It was a very interesting read Mr. Fu. I agree with yourself and Lady C as well though. What is the point of wanting to live so long? In the end, we will still die. I'd rather live a happy, healthy eating, quality 80 or so years than possibly 120 miserable calorie restricted ones.
Lift2Live is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-Dec-04, 10:57 AM   #6
CliffStamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady C
That is asinine. He is losing all of his muscle mass! I would much rather worry about having to work in another routine per week to keep my shape than having to buy another sweater to stay warm.
He is trading his muscle mass to live longer. The studies show a much longer lifespan, almost double is possible. So for those people they would rather live an extra 40-50 years than bench press another 100 lbs.

If you knew you could add 15 lbs of muscle to your body tomorrow but it would kill you 30 years earlier, would you really do it. That is essentially the argument they are making in reverse. If they bulked up they would did a *massive* amount quicker, and we are not talking weeks, but decades.

They also are not cold because of losing muscle mass, but because specifically their metabolism has slowed down to its lowest possible rate to try an conserve energy, all their brown adipose tissue for example has been consumed.

The adjunt to this is that the immune system is at its lowest load, and rates of healthy processes like instigated weakened cell death is *way* up.

-Cliff
CliffStamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-Dec-04, 02:31 PM   #7
cursor
[ exSiteMgr ]
 
cursor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: lunar equator
Age: 56
Posts: 10,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by referenced article
They're pinning their hopes on research ... showing that animals ... live longer and better when they eat substantially less.
Less than what? Less than most Americans? Rather than focusing on finding the minimal amount that I can eat to encourage a longer life, I prefer to place more emphasis on eating the proper foods (component choices and volume) that will offer
  • Relatively efficient satiety
  • Stimulating taste
  • Adequate energy to fuel responsible strength-building, ensure flexibility, and maintain normal body temperature
  • Minimize fat storage (the prime indicator of excess)
Quote:
Originally Posted by reference article
But here's the hitch: No one knows what the long-term results will be with humans or what the downside of eating this way might be. Dr. Walford died this year of ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease, at age 79, considerably short of his goal.

For humans, "there's no proof that calorie restriction prolongs life because we basically don't have those studies," says Jo Ann Carson, professor of clinical nutrition at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas.

"It is scientifically plausible," she says.
There are lots of seemingly extreme methods that people employ to try and extend their lives. Certainly some are more effective than others. Jack LaLanne just turned 90. Now he did some pretty crazy things during his years! How much of it really contributed to his longer-than-normal life? Might he have done less and still lived as long (not that he's done living, mind you)? How much of what he did actually cost him in terms of development and wellness?

We each need to find our way to a satisfying level of health and personal fulfillment. Clarence Bass terms it "The Ownership Principle."

The Ownership Principle
The Ownership Principle — Still Working 12 Years Later
The Ownership Principle at Work
__________________
¯
Push your limits — define aggressive goals
__________·«__c u r s o r__»·
_________P R O G R E S S___P I C S

Last edited by cursor; 01-Dec-04 at 03:12 PM. Reason: fixed formatting error
cursor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-Dec-04, 02:52 PM   #8
Octagon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 46
Posts: 2,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lift2Live
It was a very interesting read Mr. Fu. I agree with yourself and Lady C as well though. What is the point of wanting to live so long? In the end, we will still die. I'd rather live a happy, healthy eating, quality 80 or so years than possibly 120 miserable calorie restricted ones.
Just to be a bit of a Devil's Advocate, isn't that remarkably similar to rationalizations offered by smokers, drinkers and the average pizza place customer?
Octagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-Dec-04, 03:41 PM   #9
Lift2Live
Registered User
 
Lift2Live's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Age: 33
Posts: 2,204
Send a message via Yahoo to Lift2Live
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octagon
Just to be a bit of a Devil's Advocate, isn't that remarkably similar to rationalizations offered by smokers, drinkers and the average pizza place customer?
Yes, quite! LOL I would think that smoking and eating crap without a care though, is the other extreme of this spectrum. I think I prefer the happy medium. Make good choices but don't forget to enjoy life. There are too many more important problems in the world to be SO self-concerned about living as long as possible and vice-versa.
Lift2Live is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-Dec-04, 08:37 PM   #10
bad2woo
HUGE BITCH!
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Florida
Age: 20
Posts: 61
Send a message via AIM to bad2woo
good god... people dont live for 100+ years for reason!!

Who wants to live for more than 100 years anyway, i'd rather "walk away early than limp away late". So rather than being in a wheelchair with an O2 tube jammed in my nose, wearing diapers that i wore when i was 1-2 years old, needing someone wipe my own ass for me because i can barely move, and being put in a nursing home (i hate nursing homes)... I really would choose death... by that age i will probably have seen everything but Christ anyways, so bring him on!

This guy will be sorry once he gets so weak that he can barely move, and when that time comes there will be nothing he can do about it... :-\
__________________
BIG.
__________________________________
Who dares, wins.
bad2woo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-Dec-04, 07:43 AM   #11
CliffStamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by cursor
Less than what? Less than most Americans?
No less than your BMR. This is old news, like decades. People have been dieting this way for a long time now. Its not something which came from a weight loss perspective, its a lifespan thing.

There are a number of reasons why it promotes a longer life, mainly free radical reduction and increases in damaged cell elimination. Again we are talking about < BMR vs BMR not vs obese.

It comes down to what do you feel is more important being a little stronger and getting to eat more, or living another 20-40 years.

Taste has nothing to do with it, there are no restricted foods, so you can still have the things you like to eat, just not much of them.

Some of the CR people are also quite physically active, they are not very bulky though, and carry very little extra muscle mass.

To get some perspective, you are talking about 1000-1500 for an adult man and 750-1250 for an adult woman.

Their overall levels of nutrition is insanely high for most because they usually take great care to eat very nutrient foods. So if you look at the vitamin / mineral profile its very high.

-Cliff
CliffStamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-Dec-04, 08:48 AM   #12
cursor
[ exSiteMgr ]
 
cursor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: lunar equator
Age: 56
Posts: 10,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by reference article
"I [Michael Cooper] don't eat fruit except berries," he says. "I stay away from bananas – too many calories for the nutrition. What I eat, I like, too. I really enjoy what I eat. ... I'll occasionally have chocolate.
Mr. Cooper's eating philosophies determine what he will allow himself to eat (frequently restricting taste). I do the same. I've never had a Krispy Kreme pastry (and probably never will). Oh well. My idea for personal nutrition is to base my diet on nutrient-rich/calorie-poor foods that are high in fiber. Doing so ensures both satiety and good health.

Quote:
Originally Posted by reference article
He [Michael Cooper] adheres closely to the mix of high-nutrient, low-calorie foods.
It looks like Mr. Cooper agrees with me (at least to some extent).

A book that I've found valuable that addresses longevity and its connection to diet is The RealAge Diet, by Dr. Michael F. Roizen.

Preface: Food Can Make You Younger!

Food is celebration. Food nourishes us, sustains us, makes us grow, and gives us energy. It can be a positive force in your life, making you feel good, alive, and growing younger every day.

Eating the RealAge way is eating for good health and a good life, delaying or reversing aging, and having fun while you re doing it. This is not another diet book: If there's one thing you'll leam from this book, it's that no matter who you are, if you eat foods that are high in nutrients and low in calories, your body is going to be healthier and younger than you ever dreamed possible. Grow old gracefully? Not you. You'll live life to your youngest!

In this book you'll leam that:
  • Nutritious eating can be an easy, fun part of your life.
  • Great choices will slow the aging process and even reverse it.
  • RealAge eating will help you lose weight and keep it off.
  • You can eat sensibly and healthfully, at home or when eating out.
  • You can modify the popular weight-loss diets to make them healthier.
  • There's no need for yo-yo dieting. You can lose weight and keep it off.
  • Keeping the RealAge hourglass in mind will help you make smart food choices. Eating foods in the middle of the hourglass widens your middle and speeds up the aging process. Eating foods in the bottom half of the hourglass actually slows or reverses the aging process, slowing the sands of time.
  • RealAge foods are nutrient rich, calorie poor, and world-class delicious!
  • Eating the RealAge way increases your energy.
It sounds counterintuitive, but you can slow aging and even grow younger. Your RealAge, or biological age, can grow younger as your calendar age gets older. RealAge is not only a measurement of how fast your body is aging but also a set of steps for slowing that rate. In my first book, RealAge: Are You as Young as You Can Be?, I outlined forty-four factors you can change to affect your rate of aging.

In this book, I examine the food-related factors that multiple studies indicate can cause you to age faster than you should. I also give you strategies for eating tastier, healthier, and more nutritious food—food that will help you stay younger longer. I look at principles of sensible weight loss and weight management and explain how and why certain fad diet plans help you lose weight and whether they cause needless aging. And I provide general principles you can follow to eat younger for the rest of your life, so you'll be healthier and more energetic.

Learning how to eat the RealAge way is the same as learning how to do anything: riding a bike, using a computer, reading. Practice and a little coaching go a long way. Changing your eating habits requires a little time and consistent commitment. If you aren't used to eating foods that make you younger, it isn't second nature. But to make healthy eating an enjoyable, natural part of your life, you just have to take the first step. Making your RealAge younger is easier and more fun than you ever imagined!
__________________
¯
Push your limits — define aggressive goals
__________·«__c u r s o r__»·
_________P R O G R E S S___P I C S
cursor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-Dec-04, 10:02 AM   #13
CliffStamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by cursor
It looks like Mr. Cooper agrees with me (at least to some extent).
None of the CR people would agree with your diet because you are eating about twice as much as you would be on thier plan and are ~30 lbs overweight.

Having extra muscle and a higher growth rate from a high protein / high fat diet doesn't make you live longer, you will die faster. Compare to a lean individual.

Of course you live a lot longer than an overweight (by fat) person and are a lot more physically capable than the CR people.

Note that there are roughly three large camps of CR diets :

1) rigerous diet and exercise
2) rigerous diet
3) just CR

The last one will actually just keep the calories low, they will not be that concerned about nutrient density as much as total calories, and claim that this is of more importance - and you can make an arguement for it from the data.

The dabate still is on as to which group will have the longest lifespan, then of course you have to consider which one is more productive. Would you rather be able to bench press 175 lbs at 75, or be alive and still active at 100.

-Cliff
CliffStamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-Dec-04, 10:15 AM   #14
kungfu74
-|||------|||-
 
kungfu74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Age: 34
Posts: 593
One thing that has cracked me up about all this "debate".... nobody can 'truly' control how long they will live due to accidents such as car wrecks, and many other possible ways of dying.... look at Dr Atkins who slipped on an icy street and bumped his head causing an epidural hematoma....
__________________
pick weight up, put weight down!
kungfu74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-Dec-04, 11:13 AM   #15
CliffStamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,032
Of course you can always die from many things, lots of diseases now are killing very healthy people mainly due to very high polulation densities which allow very rapid propogation. Its all about maximizing your chance for a longer life.

Note as well these people are not unhappy constantly thinking about being hungry and eating. They are essentially people to whom food isn't a big part of life as there are other things they enjoy much more than eating and thus they would rather be around to do them than eat.

-Cliff
CliffStamp is offline   Reply With Quote