one thing i find interesting about these studies is that they count things like number of gyms available, number of parks with trails, number of
fast food places per capita....but really just because a city has more gyms or trails or biking routes available dosen't mean people USE them.
i have a very hard time understanding how seattle can be the #2 fittest city when one of the most common jokes is that most people here are overweight, and unattractive. lol. i also don't understand how LA is considered one of the fattest!
interesting article though!