I recently read an article that seemed to make some sense to me, so I decided to attempt to follow its priciples although not to a t. It basically tells you to do 8 weeks at a 10 rep range, followed by 8 weeks at a 4-6 rep range, then a 1-3 rep range, you know basic periodization.
My twist was that I set up a program where I would start the 10 rep phase with below maximum weights, almost like HST training. So if I could do say 225x10 for squat for a set, I would start with like 205x10 for 3 sets on week one, and add 5 pounds every time I get all three sets of 10. So assuming I can do it, by like week 6, I am back at my original 225x10 but for 3 sets now instead of one, then I keep going up as I can.
When the 8 weeks are over, I move to the 4-6 rep range by adding 5 pounds to whatever I ended my 10 rep period with. So for squats, if I got up to 235x10 for 3 sets, then I would start the 4-6 rep phase with 240x6 for 3 sets. So on and so on, then after this 8 weeks, take a week off and go back to the 10 rep phase with a higher starting point...
Now I like this idea on paper, has anyone ever tried a periodized program and can share their results with it? They all seem to say it's a great way to train since you shouldn't be subjecting your body to failure or
high intensity stimulus all the time, you need to give it time to adjust to the increasing stimulus. A point was made that if you always try to beat what you did the last time eventually you will fail since it is not possible, which I can kind of relate to as I have been lifting heavy in the 4-6 rep range exclusively for the past almost 2 years and I can say that I do feel a bit burned out by it.
I will conclude by asking this: In my example of squats, if I can do a set of 10 with 225 now, and at the end of 16 weeks (if I were to follow my program and advanced as appropriately) would 3 sets of say 5 at 280 lbs be a significant increase in that time, and is it realistic?