| General Bodybuilding Forum for intermediate and experienced bodybuilders to learn and give advice. |
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
29-May-05, 05:41 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Riverside
Age: 23
Posts: 6
|
Where's my six pack?
I used to be rather chubby and unathletic but I started working out regularly and changed my diet around a year and a half ago and I've gotten down to 6% body fat and my physique is pretty good. I've read around that most of the time you cannot see a six pack until less than 10% body fat. Well for me at 6% you can only see any definition when I flex and I still have a little pudge at the bottom of my stomach. I was wondering if this could be remedied in any way or if anyone had this problem, any help would be very appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
|
|
|
|
29-May-05, 05:54 PM
|
#2
|
|
Site Admin
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,681
|
Are you doing any ab work? Those muscles need to be developed before you can see them.
__________________
Train the body as it truly is: one, flexible piece!
|
|
|
29-May-05, 06:01 PM
|
#3
|
|
Hi Drama Queen
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Near Toronto, Ontario
Age: 41
Posts: 6,491
|
also, exactly how are you getting at your body fat result? depending on the technique, error can be plus or minus a full 10%.
if you've actually got pudge on your stomach, it makes me doubt the accuracy of the reading you were given.
__________________
Goals: bench - 200; squat - 225; deadlift - 225
27/01/06: bench - 170; squat - 195 (wrapped); deadlift - 210; total - 575; need - 617; to go - 42
"Illegitimi non carborundum"
|
|
|
29-May-05, 06:37 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Riverside
Age: 23
Posts: 6
|
I've thought of that I definitely do ab work although I'm sure it could be worked harder as I tend to work out other muscle groups harder and longer. I got two readings, one from one that you hold in your hands and it read below 10% but couldn't actually come up with a reading and then a fat pinching measurement and it was measured on my stomach where there was some fat and on my chest and thigh where there was almost none at all. Well thanks for the responses I suppose I will just add more time to ab work and get another reading on body fat.
|
|
|
29-May-05, 06:46 PM
|
#5
|
|
Hi Drama Queen
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Near Toronto, Ontario
Age: 41
Posts: 6,491
|
why bother with the readings?
also, your ab work: what kind of workout are you doing and how often?
generally, work your abs like any other body part - twice a week at the most - and use weights. 3 or 4 sets of 10 - 12 reps of weighted crunches or rope crunches will bring them out bigtime.
__________________
Goals: bench - 200; squat - 225; deadlift - 225
27/01/06: bench - 170; squat - 195 (wrapped); deadlift - 210; total - 575; need - 617; to go - 42
"Illegitimi non carborundum"
|
|
|
29-May-05, 08:33 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Riverside
Age: 23
Posts: 6
|
The reason I bothered with readings was I didn't want to keep my calorie intake below the amount that I was burning every day once I was around essential fat, other than that they had little meaning to me except my abs weren't showing up when I assumed I wouldn't be able to lose more fat at 6%. Thanks all for the input, it has been quite helpful.
|
|
|
29-May-05, 09:08 PM
|
#7
|
|
Hi Drama Queen
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Near Toronto, Ontario
Age: 41
Posts: 6,491
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by imcgr001
The reason I bothered with readings was I didn't want to keep my calorie intake below the amount that I was burning every day once I was around essential fat, other than that they had little meaning to me except my abs weren't showing up when I assumed I wouldn't be able to lose more fat at 6%. Thanks all for the input, it has been quite helpful.
|
it's always better to rely on the mirror and your pants. when you see your abs, you know you're below 7%. when you see vascularity in the lower abdomen, you're at around 4%.
keep on keeping on and you'll get your six-pack, sure as shootin'  :
__________________
Goals: bench - 200; squat - 225; deadlift - 225
27/01/06: bench - 170; squat - 195 (wrapped); deadlift - 210; total - 575; need - 617; to go - 42
"Illegitimi non carborundum"
|
|
|
29-May-05, 09:45 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canberra, AUS
Age: 23
Posts: 1,190
|
some people just dont have visible abs, or abs as visible as others. its all about the genes.
|
|
|
29-May-05, 10:07 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Riverside
Age: 23
Posts: 6
|
That is one other thing I was considering was the possibility that I would never even have visible abs, but no harm in attempting I suppose. I'm sure not going to get upset if I will never have visible abs if that's just no in the cards for me.
|
|
|
29-May-05, 11:43 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brand New Colony
Posts: 818
|
whats your ab workout look like?
|
|
|
29-May-05, 11:53 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Riverside
Age: 23
Posts: 6
|
Pretty much sit ups and crunches along with leg raises without weights. I also do back extensions for lower back and use the same thing to do sides, do sides with weight. Like I said, I most likely need to work on abs harder because it is easily my least worked muscle group, although I always do work it out.
|
|
|
30-May-05, 12:29 AM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,411
|
Bodyweight ab exercises won't take you far at all in terms of strength. Decline weighted sit ups, hanging leg raises with weight, side bends, etc. are all a good start.
|
|
|
31-May-05, 01:03 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Age: 26
Posts: 894
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by threenorns
it's always better to rely on the mirror and your pants. when you see your abs, you know you're below 7%. when you see vascularity in the lower abdomen, you're at around 4%.
|
Is that a good measure for 4%. What is the safe minium for men. Any other metrics for the low range?
|
|
|
31-May-05, 01:05 PM
|
#15
|
|
Hi Drama Queen
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Near Toronto, Ontario
Age: 41
Posts: 6,491
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rbuchman
Is that a good measure for 4%. What is the safe minium for men. Any other metrics for the low range?
|
4% IS the safe lower limit for men - actually, now they're saying 5%. any lower for too long and you'll end up in emerg, as happened to sylvester stallone during the filming of Rambo when he went down to 3%.
__________________
Goals: bench - 200; squat - 225; deadlift - 225
27/01/06: bench - 170; squat - 195 (wrapped); deadlift - 210; total - 575; need - 617; to go - 42
"Illegitimi non carborundum"
|
|
|
|
Tags
|
body fat, cable rope, cable rope crunches, calorie intake, hanging leg, hanging leg raise, hanging leg raises, rope crunches, weighted crunch, weighted crunches, weighted sit, weighted situps  |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Sitemap: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 PM.
|