Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   Discuss Fitness > Bodybuilding > Strength Training

Strength Training Forum for Powerlifting, Olympic Lifts, Strongman Competitors, Kettlebell Training, and other forms of strength training


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-Jul-05, 05:07 AM   #1
DarkLord
Registered User
 
DarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Age: 30
Posts: 561
Smile

Bent Over Rows


I'm not sure, but I think bent over rows count as a power exercise. Anyway my question is....should I treat the bent over row as an essential tool due to the fact I'm tall? Also what is the best grip, over or underhand?
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
DarkLord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-Jul-05, 07:40 AM   #2
threenorns
Hi Drama Queen
 
threenorns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Near Toronto, Ontario
Age: 41
Posts: 6,491
BOR are an excellent exercise for the back - to my thinking, it's one of the must-haves. i would think they'd be even more effective for you with your height.

i use an overhand grip because i prefer to target the lats more and biceps less. from doing low seated cable rows with an underhand grip, i believe underhand involves the biceps more but gives you a better ROM if you're using DB (barbells, well, you can only go "so" high).
__________________
Goals: bench - 200; squat - 225; deadlift - 225
27/01/06: bench - 170; squat - 195 (wrapped); deadlift - 210; total - 575; need - 617; to go - 42
"Illegitimi non carborundum"

Last edited by threenorns; 18-Jul-05 at 07:42 AM.
threenorns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-Jul-05, 09:08 AM   #3
Lady C
"I know squat"
 
Lady C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,626
There is always the reverse grip (one hand over, one hand under). Switch the grip on sets to even out the muscles worked.

BOR is a core exercise. I have heard that wide grip works more of the shoulders where a narrower grip uses more lats.
Lady C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-Jul-05, 09:15 AM   #4
cursor
[ exSiteMgr ]
 
cursor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: lunar equator
Age: 56
Posts: 10,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkLord
should I treat the bent over row as an essential tool due to the fact I'm tall?
Why do you think that your height might be a factor in determining whether or not this exercise is appropriate for you?
__________________
¯
Push your limits — define aggressive goals
__________·«__c u r s o r__»·
_________P R O G R E S S___P I C S

Last edited by cursor; 18-Jul-05 at 09:17 AM.
cursor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-Jul-05, 10:07 AM   #5
Shamrock
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 245
People are always amazed at how much weight than can do for B.O.R.'s. Some of the people I've seen start it for the first time have never touched a dumbell that high before!
__________________
"We smile and nod sympathetically like we feel your pain, but actually, we're thinking that you're a pathetic piece of **** that needs to grow a spine and join a gym"
Shamrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-Jul-05, 12:13 PM   #6
DarkLord
Registered User
 
DarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Age: 30
Posts: 561
The tricky part is is BOR better than the T-bar or are the same in respects of muscle usage. I know that if you use a fairly wide grip on that bent over row you stimulate more of mid traps?
DarkLord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-Jul-05, 12:21 PM   #7
threenorns
Hi Drama Queen
 
threenorns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Near Toronto, Ontario
Age: 41
Posts: 6,491
with t-bar, you isolate the lats more and dont need to use secondary muscle groups as much. that's why i prefer BOR, which is more of a compound exercise.

there's also a difference in the angle of attack and you can adjust your stance to suit your form, rather than having to adjust your form to suit the t-bar.
__________________
Goals: bench - 200; squat - 225; deadlift - 225
27/01/06: bench - 170; squat - 195 (wrapped); deadlift - 210; total - 575; need - 617; to go - 42
"Illegitimi non carborundum"
threenorns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-Jul-05, 03:04 PM   #8
Lift2Live
Registered User
 
Lift2Live's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Age: 33
Posts: 2,204
Send a message via Yahoo to Lift2Live
BOR's are a "meat n' potatoes" exercise for the back, as everyone is saying. You might actually find a better contraction with a double underhand grip, alot of people do. Your height really shouldn't matter but for width, go 'just' outside shoulder width for best all around results.
Lift2Live is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-Jul-05, 04:16 AM   #9
DaRkAnGel
Registered User
 
DaRkAnGel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 20
Posts: 5,301
Send a message via AIM to DaRkAnGel Send a message via Yahoo to DaRkAnGel
BORs are more than meat and potatoes for me. I row twice a week and have done a rowing variation almost every single week for the last year in workouts.

Trust me, these things put a crapload of muscle on your back and arms. Without ever doing pullups consistently(just seing every now and then how many i could do) when i bulked to 242 i was able to do 9.
__________________
You will die, when i say, you will die, back to the front.
DaRkAnGel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
cable row, cable rows, compound exercise, overhand grip, seated cable row, seated cable rows, underhand grip, wide grip



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 PM.


vBulletin ©2004 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004 DiscussFitness.com