Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   Discuss Fitness > General > Nutritional Supplements

Nutritional Supplements Which supplements work? Which don't? Come and discuss related topics in here.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20-Mar-03, 11:10 PM   #16
MuscleMama
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 480
Anytime, S.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
MuscleMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-Mar-03, 02:03 PM   #17
-TDS-
Registered User
 
-TDS-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 139
Quote:
Originally posted by MuscleMama
The BVs (bioavailability values, which is basically a fancy term for absorption rates) of the different types of protein, from highest to lowest, are as follows:
I'm not confident that's entirely true MuscleMama -- I don't think there is currently a standard scale for absorption rates (although I'm sure it correlates to other scales somewhat).

The best definition I've found of BV (and other scoring methods) is here:

Exposing Protein Myths
-TDS- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-Mar-03, 09:41 PM   #18
MuscleMama
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 480
TDS:

Actually, there is a BV chart for all the different types of proteins. These results (percentages of absorption and respective rates) are produced from research studies. The above list is just something that I produced from memory ... years of studying the stuff.

~ MuscleMama ~
MuscleMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-Mar-03, 02:26 PM   #19
-TDS-
Registered User
 
-TDS-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 139
No, that's not quite what I meant -- I've seen the BV chart for the various proteins. I was saying that BV is not necessarily the absorbtion rate of a protein, it's (according to the article link in my last post) a measure of the nitrogen retention...
-TDS- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-Mar-03, 03:09 PM   #20
Steve
Registered User
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Age: 47
Posts: 3,825
Send a message via ICQ to Steve Send a message via MSN to Steve
Quote:
Originally posted by -TDS-
BV is not necessarily the absorbtion rate of a protein
Is this true?

I, for one, would really like to see an ABSORBTION RATE chart....if it exists. I've never seen one, although I have been searching.

Steve

Last edited by Steve; 24-Mar-03 at 03:20 PM.
Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-Mar-03, 03:23 PM   #21
-TDS-
Registered User
 
-TDS-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 139
I'm pretty confident it doesn't exist, unfortunately... There's heaps of other scoring methods (best collection was in that article) but it appears less research has been done on absorbtion rates.

Aside from the whey vs. casein studies that stirred everything up, I haven't seen any standardized methods for establishing the AR for various proteins. Although, with everyone trying to market their "ultra-fast" or "time-release" formula or whatever, hopefully this will become a focus of research...
-TDS- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-Mar-03, 08:55 PM   #22
MuscleMama
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 480
Simple: Nitrogen retention and absorption rates are directly related.

~ MuscleMama ~
MuscleMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-Mar-03, 01:15 PM   #23
-TDS-
Registered User
 
-TDS-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 139
But I didn't say they weren't related, on the contrary:

Quote:
Originally posted by -TDS-
I don't think there is currently a standard scale for absorption rates (although I'm sure it correlates to other scales somewhat).
But if you're saying that they're directly related to the point that BV=AR then the Casein vs. Whey studies wouldn't be a surprise to anyone. Some company would have already been touting "Egg Protein: The Ultimate Balanced Release" or "Rice Protein: 12 Hour Release" (who knows, maybe they are! ).

If we say nitrogen retention is the ultimate goal, then we'd look simply for the highest known BV -- we'd ignore everything except Whey Isolate, which as recent information shows, is not necessarily the ideal situation because absorbtion rate does matter...
-TDS- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-Mar-03, 08:53 PM   #24
Shredded
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 322
BV is one of the most commonly used and is arguably, the best measure of a protein's quality. BV is based on how much of the protein consumed is actually absorbed and utilized by the body. The higher the amount of protein (nitrogen) that is actually retained, the greater the BV.The BV rating isn't the absorption rate of a protein.
Shredded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-Mar-03, 09:05 PM   #25
Shredded
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally posted by MuscleMama
Simple: Nitrogen retention and absorption rates are directly related.

~ MuscleMama ~
BV helps us to understand which proteins are most efficient at depositing nitrogen into muscles not how fast they deposit nitrogen.
Shredded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Mar-03, 08:51 PM   #26
MuscleMama
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 480
TDS: Of course it's not the IDEAL situation - that would come from a combination of proteins (not just one type), as I've mentioned before.

Shredded: Everything you said is correct. Now combine what YOU said with what I said ... and you'll have the total concept of BV.

Get huge,
MuscleMama
MuscleMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Mar-03, 09:48 PM   #27
Shredded
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally posted by MuscleMama
TDS: Of course it's not the IDEAL situation - that would come from a combination of proteins (not just one type), as I've mentioned before.

Shredded: Everything you said is correct. Now combine what YOU said with what I said ... and you'll have the total concept of BV.

Get huge,
MuscleMama
So then why is egg considered a slow acting protein when it's got such a high BV?
Shredded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Mar-03, 11:14 PM   #28
MuscleMama
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 480
Shredded:

Ahhh ... NOW I see why you're confused!

OK, let me explain. ... You already stated a pretty good definition of BV. However, the "rate" part is what's getting you confused. For example, whey protein has a BV of 100 percent (it's actually MORE than 100 percent, but I won't get into that here), which means that 100 percent of the protein is absorbed by the body; egg proten has a BV of about 95 percent, which means that 95 percent of the protein is actually absorbed by the body. It's not really the "rate" at which the protein is absorbed; it's the actual AMOUNT of protein that gets absorbed, versus excreted.

Hope this helps.

Keep pumpin',
MuscleMama
MuscleMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-Mar-03, 11:27 PM   #29
Shredded
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally posted by MuscleMama
Shredded:

Ahhh ... NOW I see why you're confused!

OK, let me explain. ... You already stated a pretty good definition of BV. However, the "rate" part is what's getting you confused. For example, whey protein has a BV of 100 percent (it's actually MORE than 100 percent, but I won't get into that here), which means that 100 percent of the protein is absorbed by the body; egg proten has a BV of about 95 percent, which means that 95 percent of the protein is actually absorbed by the body. It's not really the "rate" at which the protein is absorbed; it's the actual AMOUNT of protein that gets absorbed, versus excreted.

Hope this helps.

Keep pumpin',
MuscleMama
I thought what he meant by "absorption rate" was if it's a fast or slow releasing protein not what percentage of the protein is absorbed which of course is the BV rating
Shredded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-Mar-03, 01:33 PM   #30
-TDS-
Registered User
 
-TDS-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 139
No you're right Shredded, that's what I meant by AR...

Frankly MuscleMama, I'm confused too, because here you say BV=AR:
Quote:
Originally posted by MuscleMama
The BVs (bioavailability values, which is basically a fancy term for absorption rates) of the different types of protein, from highest to lowest, are as follows:
(I posted my contention with this...)

And then now you are saying don't confuse BV with AR:

Quote:
Originally posted by MuscleMama
OK, let me explain. ... You already stated a pretty good definition of BV. However, the "rate" part is what's getting you confused. For example, whey protein has a BV of 100 percent (it's actually MORE than 100 percent, but I won't get into that here), which means that 100 percent of the protein is absorbed by the body; egg proten has a BV of about 95 percent, which means that 95 percent of the protein is actually absorbed by the body. It's not really the "rate" at which the protein is absorbed; it's the actual AMOUNT of protein that gets absorbed, versus excreted.
(I agree! This is what we were just debating!)
-TDS- is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
banner ad, milk protein, protein isolate, protein requirements, protein source, protein sources, raw egg, train smart, whey concentrate, whey isolate, whey protein, whey protein isolate



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.


vBulletin ©2004 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004 DiscussFitness.com