Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   Discuss Fitness > General > Nutritional Supplements

Nutritional Supplements Which supplements work? Which don't? Come and discuss related topics in here.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28-Mar-03, 03:03 PM   #31
Shredded
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 322
TDS:The only studies i've seen on fast and slow acting proteins have been on milk proteins which everyone has seen.I believe the absoprtion rate is related to the proteins density(molecular weight) I've never seen a protein density chart.Muscle mama could be right if the faster the protein is absorbed the more protein synthesis is stimulated,but I've never seen any real proof of this and I don't think that's a factor in BV ratings.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Shredded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-Mar-03, 03:22 PM   #32
-TDS-
Registered User
 
-TDS-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 139
I with that Shredded, I wouldn't be surprised if AR is largely determined by a factor like MW, and I've never seen a chart either.

I have seen information that in the same way that the "slow" proteins are anti-catabolic, the "fast" proteins can be anabolic through hyperaminoacidemia. But I agree again, this is probably more speculative and it doesn't directly connect to BV ratings.
-TDS- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-Mar-03, 08:09 PM   #33
Shredded
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 322
PS claims that whey has over a 100 BV rating is impossible
Shredded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-Mar-03, 08:33 PM   #34
MuscleMama
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 480
*sigh*

It's so difficult sometimes to explain what you mean via typing on a computer screen.

Sorry if my words didn't powerfully convey my thoughts. 'Twas not my intention to confuse you.

Very briefly (and hopefully without further confusion): BV (Biological Value) of a protein is the percentage rate of the amount of protein that actually gets absorbed and utilized by the body.

(Better?)

~ MuscleMama ~
MuscleMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-Mar-03, 09:03 PM   #35
Shredded
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally posted by MuscleMama
*sigh*

It's so difficult sometimes to explain what you mean via typing on a computer screen.

Sorry if my words didn't powerfully convey my thoughts. 'Twas not my intention to confuse you.

Very briefly (and hopefully without further confusion): BV (Biological Value) of a protein is the percentage rate of the amount of protein that actually gets absorbed and utilized by the body.

(Better?)

~ MuscleMama ~
That is the definition of BV Sometimes it's hard for me to understand what's being asked too
Shredded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-Mar-03, 11:00 PM   #36
MuscleMama
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 480
Right, that IS what BV is. So, you understand what I'm saying now? No more confusion?

(Whew!)

Now shut up and TRAIN,
MuscleMama
MuscleMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-Mar-03, 11:19 PM   #37
Shredded
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally posted by MuscleMama
Right, that IS what BV is. So, you understand what I'm saying now? No more confusion?

(Whew!)

Now shut up and TRAIN,
MuscleMama
Yes.I understand what you meant
Shredded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-Mar-03, 10:33 AM   #38
MuscleMama
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 480
COOL!
MuscleMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-Mar-03, 08:05 PM   #39
HiVol
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 15
You shouldn't even be wasting your breath on something so outdated as BV. Do some research on 'net nitrogen utilisation' and you'll find its the measure that's relevant for BBrs.
HiVol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-Mar-03, 10:38 PM   #40
MuscleMama
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 480
HiVol:

Yes, we know all about net nitrogen utilization - that's nothing new. However, BV is still useful. Just because something new comes along doesn't necessarily mean you ditch all past information.

~ MuscleMama ~
MuscleMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-Apr-03, 12:12 AM   #41
4banger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 354
The BV is the amount of nitrogen used for tissue formation divided by the amount of nitrogen absorbed from food times 100, it is a percentage so it can never be greater than 100%.
Egg has the highest BV wich is just about 100%. It has nothing to do with the rate that the protein is absorbed (how fast).

Last edited by 4banger; 03-Apr-03 at 12:43 AM.
4banger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-Apr-03, 07:31 AM   #42
Steve
Registered User
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Age: 47
Posts: 3,825
Send a message via ICQ to Steve Send a message via MSN to Steve
Quote:
Originally posted by 4banger
The BV is the amount of nitrogen used for tissue formation divided by the amount of nitrogen absorbed from food times 100, it is a percentage so it can never be greater than 100%.
Egg has the highest BV wich is just about 100%. It has nothing to do with the rate that the protein is absorbed (how fast).
cool!

Now back to my original question.....I know that whey protein is faster absorbed than ..say cassein protein. Can anyone (who knows about this stuff) please post a list of the order of the rate of asorbtion....??

I guess it's like this...
1. whey
2. albumin
3. soy
4. cassein

Is that about right?

And then where do beef, chicken and fish come into this equation?

Steve
Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-Apr-03, 09:52 AM   #43
4banger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 354
Quoted from a Muscle media magazine...
Top is faster


Whey Hydrolysate
Whey Isolate
Soy
Egg
Milk protein isolate
Meats
Cassein

They didn't specify separate types of meats so I think they probably have a similar absortion rate.

This shows how BV is not related to absortion rate, the BV of soy is around 74 and it digests faster than egg protein wich has a BV of 100.

Last edited by 4banger; 03-Apr-03 at 09:56 AM.
4banger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-Apr-03, 01:09 PM   #44
MuscleMama
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 480
4banger: Actually, it CAN be higher than 100 percent, as is whey protein. It's too complicated to go into here, but it IS correct. (Very briefly: It's because of not only the BV but the nitrogen retention – and formulated results – as well.)

Steve: I've already answered that.

Get huge,
MuscleMama
MuscleMama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-Apr-03, 01:28 PM   #45
Shredded
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 322
Quote:
Originally posted by MuscleMama
4banger: Actually, it CAN be higher than 100 percent, as is whey protein. It's too complicated to go into here, but it IS correct. (Very briefly: It's because of not only the BV but the nitrogen retention – and formulated results – as well.)

Steve: I've already answered that.

Get huge,
MuscleMama
No that's incorrect companies claiming that whey has a BV of over a 100 are either manipulating the numbers for marketing purposes or are confusing BV with a different method of determining protein quality.Absorbing more than 100 percent of anything simply doesn't make any sense think about it
Shredded is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
banner ad, milk protein, protein isolate, protein requirements, protein source, protein sources, raw egg, train smart, whey concentrate, whey isolate, whey protein, whey protein isolate



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.


vBulletin ©2004 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004 DiscussFitness.com