Sponsor Our Community
Go Back   Discuss Fitness > General > Nutritional Supplements

Nutritional Supplements Which supplements work? Which don't? Come and discuss related topics in here.


Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-Apr-06, 07:13 PM   #1
fitricise
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 341

If you take xenical, read


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060410/...4yBHNlYwNmYw--

US group says diet drug linked to pre-cancer

By Susan Heavey2 hours, 15 minutes ago

Roche Holding AG's prescription diet drug Xenical should immediately be pulled from the U.S. market after recent data linked it to precancerous colon lesions in animal studies, a consumer group told federal health regulators Monday.
Public Citizen, in a petition, also asked the Food and Drug Administration to reject making the weight-loss pill widely available over the counter.
On Friday, the FDA said it granted GlaxoSmithKline Plc conditional approval to sell the drug without a prescription if it first meets certain undisclosed criteria. Glaxo owns U.S. rights for nonprescription sales of Xenical.
"The failure to ban the prescription version of this drug, or worse, to make it much more widely available by allowing OTC sales is a decision that is likely to increase cancer incidence," Public Citizen wrote.
The group said a December 2005 study confirmed earlier company data showing Xenical, known generically as orlistat, can cause abnormal cell growth in the lining of the colon. Experts widely recognize the lesions as an early indicator of cancer, the advocacy group added.
The study, published in the journal Cancer Letters, found "a significant increase" of colon lesions in rats given Xenical regardless of whether they were on high-fat or standard diets.
"This finding makes it even clearer how ill-advised switching orlistat to OTC status would be," the petition said.
Representatives for the two drug makers were not immediately available to comment on the petition.
Xenical comes in 120-milligram capsules to be taken three times a day with meals. The proposed nonprescription version, called Alli, comes in 60 milligram tablets with one to two taken with meals.
It works by preventing fat from being absorbed by the body but can cause excess gas, oily discharge and other gastrointestinal problems.
BREAST CANCER
Public Citizen also said its review of reported side effects after Xenical hit the market in 1999 found 28 cases of breast cancer in patients taking Xenical through June 2005.
A review of its rival, Abbott Laboratories Inc.'s appetite suppressant Meridia, found two breast cancer cases between November 1997 and June 2005.
The FDA was aware of the breast cancer risk as well as possible colon lesions when it initially considered Xenical, Public Citizen said, but the agency chose to rely on the company's analysis.
An FDA spokeswomen could not be immediately reached.
The link between fat and cancer is unclear, but some studies have shown a higher risk in people who are overweight or obese. Other studies have shown no change in risk despite lower fat diets.
Some early data have shown Xenical's key ingredient can help curb fatty acids and possibly limit tumor growth, Public Citizen said, and removing it from the market would not stop future research.
But "at this point, the evidence of orlistat's ability to cause cancer is much stronger than any potential ability to prevent it," it said.
Shares of Glaxo were up 66 cents, or 1.3 percent, at $52.14 in afternoon trade on the New York Stock Exchange after earlier closing up 1.15 percent in London. Roche shares earlier closed up 1.3 percent on the Swiss market.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
__________________
Disclaimer: I am not licensed to give advice in the fields of nutrition (yet). Consult a physician if you are unsure.

http://www.fitnecise.net
fitricise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Apr-06, 07:34 PM   #2
Sethius
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 237
ouch that isn't good... or do you think it's just media blowing it out of preporsion slightly?
__________________
"weightwatchers... making it easier for uncle ben to carry your coffin"
Sethius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Apr-06, 07:52 PM   #3
.V.
Site Moderator
 
.V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Area 51
Age: 39
Posts: 10,850
Send a message via Yahoo to .V.
There is always some group looking to get something taken off the market. And the media is always willing to blow about anything out of proportion.

I'm pretty sure that the manufacturer of Clorox and the Hanes and fruit of the loom companies will come out with a rebuttal study soon enough.
__________________
I will train with you. I will fight for you if you cant. I will die to save another. But I will bleed only for Kimberly.
.V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Apr-06, 08:05 PM   #4
fitricise
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 341
true, maybe it was premature to post this.
I think a safer alternative supplement is sesamin
more sesamin goodness
__________________
Disclaimer: I am not licensed to give advice in the fields of nutrition (yet). Consult a physician if you are unsure.

http://www.fitnecise.net
fitricise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Apr-06, 08:10 PM   #5
fitricise
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 341
anyway its not a very good idea to use fat blockers cause you need some fat for fat soluble vitamin absorption, and they'll block efa's too
__________________
Disclaimer: I am not licensed to give advice in the fields of nutrition (yet). Consult a physician if you are unsure.

http://www.fitnecise.net
fitricise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-Apr-06, 08:12 PM   #6
.V.
Site Moderator
 
.V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Area 51
Age: 39
Posts: 10,850
Send a message via Yahoo to .V.
Nothing wrong with posting it. Hopefully people won't get too excited over it though. It's good to be aware of what information is out there, correct or incorrect.

I personally feel that a diet balanced to fit the individual's needs is better than taking the speed pills, greasy fart pills, stomach surgeries, or whatever other shortcut they want to use.

I've got a friend who had is stomach done - we were about equal in fatness. He lost a great deal of weight. I learned to manipulate and control my blood sugar based on my needs for the day by nutrition. Now 2.5 years later, I no longer have a weight problem - in spite of the fat gain from a "bad bulk" - it's still manageable - only got to 12% BF before I decided I was too fat again. He, however had the surgery and promptly returned to old habits - smaller amounts of food of course. Well, now he's fat again because his "new" stomach stretched to allow too much of the wrong foods.

Same applies to those who use speed, fat blockers, carb blockers, or whatever other shortcut they use.
__________________
I will train with you. I will fight for you if you cant. I will die to save another. But I will bleed only for Kimberly.
.V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
blood sugar, breast cancer, fat diets, fatty acid, fatty acids, lower fat



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Sponsor Our Community

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 PM.


vBulletin ©2004 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004 DiscussFitness.com